What Would Joana Do — Scope Matrix

All 42+ Items • Stack Ranked by VTKL+Warren Leverage • Updated with Part 1+2 Transcripts + May 19 Call
Source: May 7 In-Person (Kush, Krishna, Nathan) + May 19 Tony×Joana Scope Call
Confidential — Internal Use Only
Contracted ($5.5M)
Alliance Revenue
Big Alliance / Institutional
P2 Part 2 update
NEW New from Part 2
↑ Upgraded
Green = VTKL % · Gray = Engineering %
Cards ranked by VTKL leverage within each category — VTKL-doable first
Stack rank logic: Within each category, items are sorted by VTKL+Warren leverage % — highest first. Green bars = what we can deliver. Gray = what needs Kindo/Deloitte engineering. Part 2 changes: A.6 upgraded to 🟢 (Kush killed GenUI → headless API). P.9 GenUI killed. 2 new cross-cutting items: IK Infrastructure (80% VTKL), Agent Chaining (45% VTKL). All items include work-split %s.
14
VTKL ≥60%
11
VTKL 30-59%
19
VTKL <30%
3
Part 2 Changes

Krishna's Current State & Targets

Current Efficiency
>70%
Pre-Kindo (Swimlane)
Triage Time
21→5 min
76% reduction
Current EBITDA
~40%
Despite 70%+ efficiency
Target EBITDA
80%
With Kindo platform
Agents in Prod
4 + 1
4 prod + CTEM built
IK Dependency
55%
23/42 items · 60-75% of EBITDA

Agent Suite (A.1–A.13 + Cross-Cutting)

Sorted by VTKL leverage — highest first
#1
A.7
Quality Audit Agent P2
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 85%
15%
Warren: rubrics, Jira, audit logic, IK loopEng: UI
KRISHNAWARREN
P2: Kush wants audit agent to audit AI actions using human proof points as golden source — compound learning loop.
#2
IK
Agent Memory / IK Infrastructure NEW
HIGH📋 Cross-Cutting
VTKL 80%
20%
Warren: IK capture, 4-stage framework, schemaEng: persistence
KUSHWARREN
NEW from Part 2: Not a feature — the delivery model. Docs→shadow→reverse shadow→70% autonomous. 23/42 items depend on this.
#3
A.11
Custom Client Agents (Framework)
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 80%
20%
Warren: templates, IK capture, onboardingEng: RBAC, connectors
KRISHNAHARISHWARREN
#4
A.6
Vitals Dashboard ↑ 55→75%
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 75%
25%
Warren: KPIs, data model, thresholdsEng: pipeline, API
KRISHNAWARREN
P2 UPGRADE: Kush killed Canvas/GenUI → headless API. We define metrics, not build dashboards. UI burden eliminated.
#5
A.9
IR Agent P2
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 75%
25%
Warren: playbooks, triage, RCA, evidenceEng: SOAR, forensics
KRISHNAWARREN
P2: Agent chaining means IR orchestrates subordinate agents for evidence collection — modular design.
#6
A.8
Cloud Security Agent
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 50%
50%
Warren: detection rules, posture, remediationEng: cloud APIs
KRISHNABHARGAVWARREN
#7
AC
Agent Chaining / Supervisory NEW
HIGH📋 Cross-Cutting
VTKL 45%
55%
Warren: orchestration logic, routingEng: runtime, state mgmt
KUSHKINDO ENGWARREN
NEW from Part 2: Supervisory agent orchestrating subordinate agents. How A.1-A.5 work together in production.
#8
A.5
CTEM
HIGH🔨 BUILT
VTKL 40%
60%
Warren: IK refinement, configEng: production deploy
KRISHNA
A.1
Threat Monitoring
HIGH✅ PROD
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: IK refinementEng: platform ops
KRISHNA
A.2
Threat Intel
HIGH✅ PROD
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: IK refinementEng: platform ops
KRISHNA
A.3
Threat Hunt
HIGH✅ PROD
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: IK refinementEng: platform ops
KRISHNA
A.4
Detection Engineering
HIGH✅ PROD
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: IK refinementEng: platform ops
KRISHNA
A.10
IoT/OT Monitor
MEDIUM📋 PLANNED
VTKL 25%
75%
Warren: alerting logicEng: OT protocols, sensors
KRISHNA
A.12
Identity Agent → IdaaS
MEDIUM📋 PLANNED
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: IK methodologyEng: IAM integrations
TIM CORDERKUSH
A.13
GRC Agent → GRC aaS
MEDIUM📋 PLANNED
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: compliance templatesEng: GRC engines
NATHANKUSH

Platform Capabilities (P.1–P.10)

Sorted by VTKL leverage
#1
P.8
Custom Agent Framework
HIGH📋 PLANNED
VTKL 65%
35%
Warren: framework design, IK capture patternsEng: runtime
KUSHWARREN
#2
P.7
Integration Privacy (Private MCP) P2
HIGH🔧 In Dev
VTKL 40%
60%
Warren: isolation model, client configsEng: multi-tenant MCP
KUSHKINDO ENG
P2 elevated: Client-specific integrations must be hidden. Non-negotiable for F50 clients. Day-one requirement for A.11.
P.10
Integration Crowdsource Ecosystem
MEDIUM📋 PLANNED
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: marketplace designEng: ecosystem infra
KUSH
P.5
MVP Packaging
MEDIUM✅ Ready
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: test configsEng: repo + harness
KINDO ENG
P.3
Command Center
HIGH✅ SaaS / ⚠️ SM
VTKL 15%
85%
Warren: demo/configEng: SM parity
KUSHKINDO ENG
P.4
Chat Actions API
HIGH✅ Ready
VTKL 15%
85%
Warren: agent configs using APIEng: API platform
KUSH
P.1
Self-Managed Instance
HIGH⚠️ Issues
10%
90%
Warren: QAEng: sandbox, persistence, release
KINDO ENG
P.2
Sandbox Hardening
HIGH🔧 In Flight
10%
90%
Warren: testingEng: long-term persistence
KINDO ENG
P.6
Release Parity (SaaS ↔ SM)
HIGH🔧 Gap
5%
95%
Eng: release pipeline
KUSHKINDO ENG
P.9
GenUI / Canvas KILLED
—❌ Kush killed
N/A — Kush wants headless API instead
Part 2: Kush killed Canvas/GenUI. Kindo = headless API. Deloitte builds their own UIs. This shifts A.6 from yellow→green.

Delivery Models & Deployments (D.1–D.7)

Sorted by VTKL leverage
#1
D.6
"Products Plus" Packaging
HIGH📋 Strategic
VTKL 60%
40%
Warren: packaging design, IK frameworkEng: platform enablement
KUSHWARREN
#2
D.4
Shared MSS Efficiency Program
MEDIUMPhase 2
VTKL 45%
55%
Warren: efficiency analysis, agent configsEng: pool mgmt
KRISHNA
D.5
Dedicated MSS Scaling (Multi-F50)
MEDIUMPhase 3
VTKL 35%
65%
Warren: deployment templatesEng: container infra
KRISHNANATHAN
D.2
HP Deployment (Dedicated MSS)
HIGH📋 Planning
VTKL 30%
70%
Warren: config, IK captureEng: container deploy
KRISHNA
D.1
MXDR — Swimlane Migration
HIGH🚨 May 31
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: coordination supportEng + Deloitte ops
KRISHNA
D.3
ITS Environment Integration
MEDIUM🔧 Active
VTKL 15%
85%
Warren: QAEng: env integration
KRISHNAKINDO ENG
D.7
AEF Migration Path
MEDIUM⏳ Future
10%
90%
Eng: Deloitte mothership migration
KUSH

Service Line Expansion (S.1–S.6)

Sorted by VTKL leverage
#1
S.1
DRaaS Full Coverage
HIGH🔧 Primary
VTKL 55%
45%
Warren: IK extraction, agent designEng: platform integration
KRISHNAWARREN
S.2
CaaS Integration
MEDIUM📋 Phase 2
VTKL 35%
65%
Warren: agent frameworkEng: Nathan's domain
NATHANKUSH
S.5
Cloud + Infra Security
LOW📋 Future
VTKL 25%
75%
Warren: patterns from BhargavEng: cloud infra
BHARGAVKUSH
S.3
Identity aaS Expansion
MEDIUM📋 Phase 3
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: IK methodologyEng: Tim Corder domain
TIM CORDERKUSH
S.4
GRC aaS Expansion
MEDIUM📋 Phase 3
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: compliance templatesEng: Nathan domain
NATHANKUSH
S.6
App Security aaS
LOW📋 Future
VTKL 15%
85%
Warren: framework onlyEng: no owner yet
KUSH

Operations & Readiness (O.1–O.8)

Sorted by VTKL leverage
#1
O.3
RACI (Kindo ↔ Deloitte ↔ Client)
HIGH📋 Needed
VTKL 85%
15%
Joana: escalation matrix, 3-party RACIReview only
JOANANATHAN
#2
O.1
Training (6 Domains)
HIGH📋 Contractual
VTKL 75%
25%
Joana + Warren: curriculum, LMS contentEng: platform demos
JOANAKRISHNAWARREN
#3
O.6
LMS Portal — Module Owners
MEDIUM📋 Joana
VTKL 70%
30%
Joana + Warren: modules, content, IKEng: portal platform
JOANAKRISHNA
O.5
Channel Enablement (Krishna sync)
HIGH📋 Tony
VTKL 60%
40%
Tony + Warren: cadence, enablementDeloitte: Manik GTM
TONYKRISHNAMANIK
O.8
Client Deployment Readiness
HIGH📋 Harish+Nathan
VTKL 45%
55%
Warren: readiness checklists, templatesDeloitte: Harish+Nathan
HARISHNATHAN
O.7
Go-To-Market (Manik)
MEDIUM📋 Active
VTKL 40%
60%
Tony + Warren: positioning, materialsDeloitte: Manik India
MANIKKUSH
O.4
Swimlane→Kindo Migration Support
HIGH🚨 May 31
VTKL 20%
80%
Warren: runbook supportEng + Deloitte ops
KRISHNAKINDO ENG
O.2
Support (L1/L2/L3)
HIGH📋 Contractual
VTKL 15%
85%
Warren: escalation designL1/L2 Deloitte, L3 Kindo
KINDO ENGKRISHNA

What Would Joana Do — Scope Matrix v2 — Updated June 6, 2026

44 items across 5 categories | 🟢 Contracted | 🟡 Alliance Revenue | 🔴 Alliance Institutional | Stack ranked by VTKL+Warren leverage

Sources: May 7 Part 1+2, May 19 Tony×Joana, EBITDA Strategic Framework | Generated by Warren ⚡

Revenue Map · Execution Plan · Storyboard